Le rapport présente le Baromètre de la science ouverte (Open Science Monitoring), l'outil de suivi de la science ouverte au niveau national. Il expose la méthodologie utilisée pour calculer le taux de publications française en libre accès ainsi que les premiers résultats obtenus, aussi  pour les essais cliniques.    

Extending the open monitoring of open science

Laetitia Bracco (Université de Lorraine)
Anne L’Hôte (Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche)
Eric Jeangirard (Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche)
Didier Torny (CSI I3 – Centre de sociologie de l’innovation I3)

Avril 2022

Lire le rapport sur HAL

We present a new Open Science Monitor framework at the country level for the case of France. We propose a fine-grained monitoring of the dynamics of the open access to publications, based on historical data from Unpaywall, and thus limited to Crossref-DOI documents. The economic models of journals publishing French publications are analyéed as well as the open access dynamics by discipline and open access route (publishers and repositories).

The French Open Science Monitor (BSO) website: presents the results to date (last observation date December 2021). 62% of the 170,000 French 2020 publications are available in December 2021. This rate has increased by 10 points in one year. The level of open access varies significantly from one discipline to another. Some disciplines, such as the physical sciences and mathematics, have long been committed to opening up their publications, while others, such as chemistry, are rapidly catching up.

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis and the urgent need to open up scholarly outputs in the health field, a specific version of the French Open Science Monitor has been built: https://frenchopensciencemonitor.esr.gouv.fr/health. It monitors the open access dynamics of French publications in the biomedical field. It also analyses the transparency of the results of clinical trials and observational studies conducted in France. Only 57% of clinical trials completed in the last 10 years have shared their results publicly.

In contrast to other Open Science Monitoring initiatives, the source code and the data of the French Open Science Monitor are shared with an open licence. The source code used for the French Open Science Monitor is available on GitHub, and shared with an open licence. The data resulting of this work is shared on the French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation open data portal. 

The originality of the French Open Science Monitor also lies in the fact that it can easily be adapted to the level of an higher education and research institution. To date, some twenty higher education and research institutions have already used it to obtain reliable and open indicators on the progress of open science in their scientific production.

 

1. Introduction

2. Method

2.1 Publications

2.1.1 Perimeter definition

2.1.2 Open access dynamic

2.1.3 Open access types

2.1.4 Discipline and language impact

2.1.5 Publishers and dissemination platforms strategies

2.1.6 The role of the open repositories

2.1.7 Other analysis axes

2.2 Clinical trials and observational studies

2.2.1 Perimeter

2.2.2 Main opening indicators

2.2.3 Lead sponsor impact

2.3 ‘Local’ Open Science Monitors

2.4 Data collection system and architecture

3. Results

3.1 Open access dynamics in France

3.1.1 General dynamics

3.1.2 Open access dynamics in the different scientific fields

3.1.3 Open access dynamics and publishers policies

3.1.4 Open repositories impact on the open access dynamics

3.2 Open access in France in the biomedical field

3.3 Clinical trials transparency in France

3.4 Limitations and future research

3.4.1 Limitations

3.4.2 Future work and local implementation

Software and code availability

Data availability

Acknowledgements

References